THẦY, CÔ THƯỞNG TRÀ

LY CÀ PHÊ VỊ ĐƯỢM

Liên kết website

CÁC ĐƠN VỊ THUỘC SỞ GD

CÁC ĐƠN VỊ THUỘC PHÒNG

Tài nguyên dạy học

TIN TỨC GIÁO DỤC

Điều tra ý kiến

Bạn truy cập trang web của Câu lạc bộ Violet Hải Dương là nhằm mục đích
Giao lưu, học hỏi, giúp đỡ đồng nghiệp.
Thư giãn sau các giờ căng thẳng.
Chỉ để tải tài liệu của CLB.
Xây dựng cộng đồng Violet Hải Dương đoàn kết, thân ái.
Một lí do khác.

Thống kê

  • truy cập   (chi tiết)
    trong hôm nay
  • lượt xem
    trong hôm nay
  • thành viên
  • Khách đến Câu lạc bộ

    5 khách và 0 thành viên

    Chào mừng quý vị đến với CLB Giáo viên Hải Dương.

    Quý vị chưa đăng nhập hoặc chưa đăng ký làm thành viên, vì vậy chưa thể tải được các tư liệu của Thư viện về máy tính của mình.
    Nếu đã đăng ký rồi, quý vị có thể đăng nhập ở ngay ô bên phải.

    CHÀO MỪNG NGÀY NHÀ GIÁO VIỆT NAM 20 - 11

    HÁT ĐỂ CHUNG TAY CHỐNG BIẾN ĐỔI KHÍ HẬU

    Testing productive skills Writing

    Wait
    • Begin_button
    • Prev_button
    • Play_button
    • Stop_button
    • Next_button
    • End_button
    • 0 / 0
    • Loading_status
    Nhấn vào đây để tải về
    Báo tài liệu có sai sót
    Nhắn tin cho tác giả
    (Tài liệu chưa được thẩm định)
    Nguồn: Nguyễn Thùy Dương
    Người gửi: Gã Đầu Bạc
    Ngày gửi: 09h:43' 23-09-2014
    Dung lượng: 1.5 MB
    Số lượt tải: 9
    Số lượt thích: 0 người
    Week 7
    Testing productive skills: Writing
    Module 5119
    Language Testing and Assessment
    2
    Summer, 2011
    3
    Testing writing ability
    4
    Product mirroring process or ability
    Dominance of subjectivity
    Reliability issues

    Genres of written language
    Academic writing
    Papers and general subject reports
    Essays, compositions
    Academically focused journals
    Short-answer test responses
    Technical reports (e.g., lab reports)
    Theses, dissertations
    Genres of written language (cont.)
    Job-related reading
    Messages (e.g., phone messages)
    Letters/emails
    Memos (e.g., interoffice)
    Reports (job evaluations, project reports)
    Schedules, labels, signs
    Advertisements, announcements
    Manuals
    Genres of written language (cont.)
    Personal reading
    Letters, emails, greeting cards, invitations
    Messages, notes
    Calendar entries, shopping lists, reminders
    Financial documents (checks, tax forms, loan applications)
    Forms, questionnaires, medical reports, immigration documents
    Diaries, personal journals
    Fiction (e.g., short stories, poetry)
    Types of writing performance
    Imitative
    learners try to master the mechanics of writing (ability to spell correctly);
    primary focus is form, context and meaning are of secondary concern
    Intensive (controlled)
    skills in producing appropriate vocab. within a context, collocations
    correct grammatical features up to the length of a sentence;
    meaning and context are of some important, but a focus on form
    Responsive
    Learners required to perform at a limited discourse level connecting sentences into a prara., creating logically connected sequence of 2 or 3 paras
    Tasks respond to pedagogical directives, outlines
    Genres of writing include brief narratives, lab reports, interpretation s of charts or graphs
    Writers have mastered fundamentals of sentence-level grammar and more focused on discourse conventions
    Form-focused attention with a strong emphasis on context and meaning
    Extensive
    Implies successful management of all processes and strategies of writing for all purposes, up to the length of an essay, a thesis
    Writer focus on achieving a purpose, organizing and developing ideas logically, using details to support or illustrate ideas, demonstrating syntactic and lexical variety.
    Activity
    10
    Go through the writing skills in the handouts. In pairs, identify what skills are micro and what macro?
    Which ones are commonly used in your context of teaching and testing?
    Brainstorm some tasks that assess those skills.
    Micro and macroskills of writing
    Test development
    12
    Hughes (2003) suggests three parts:
    Setting a representative sample of writing tasks
    Eliciting valid samples of writing ability
    Ensuring valid and reliable scoring
    Sample of writing tasks
    13
    Purpose of the test
    What ability is being assessed?
    As many tasks and test formats as practical

    Test formats
    14
    Gap filling
    Copying
    Form completion
    Editing
    Open-ended essay
    Responding to given information (a prompt or assignment)
    Information transfer
    Integrated reading and writing: responses to the reading of an article or story
    (Weir, 1993)
    Designing assessment tasks: imitative writing Copying
    Designing assessment tasks: intensive writing Short sentences
    Designing assessment tasks: responsive and extensive writing
    Open-ended essay
    Is seldom completely open-ended: a task defined by the teacher or test administrator, and the writer must fulfill the criterion of the task
    In extensive writing, a set of directives stated by the teacher or is implied by the conventions of the genres
    e.g, Summaries of Readings
    Effectively capture the main and supporting ideas of the original
    Maintain objectivity in reporting
    Use writer’s own words for the most part
    Use quotations effectively when appropriate
    Omit irrelevant or marginal details
    Conform to an expected length
    Content selection
    19
    Elements of test specification framework:
    Operations
    Types of texts
    Addressees
    Topics
    Dialect and style
    Lengths
    (Hughes, 2003)


    Eliciting a valid sample of writing
    20
    Testing only writing
    1 Write the conversation you have with a friend about the holiday you plan to have together.

    2 You spend a year abroad. While you are there, you are asked to talk to a group of young people about life in your country. Write down what you would say to them.

    3 ‘Envy is the sin which most harms the sinner.’ Discuss.

    4 Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of being born into a wealthy family.
    Restricting candidates


    Valid and reliable scoring
    21
    Giving no choice of tasks
    Writing samples are long enough
    Create appropriate scales for scoring



    Activity: Criteria and standards
    22
    You are planning to have holiday abroad/read a
    novel. Make a list of 4/5 factors that you would
    take into consideration in choosing the
    country/novel.

    Spread out each of the factors in terms of three different levels or conditions. For example,

    Security =
    Absolutely safe> Somewhat risky> Dangerous





    Rating scales
    23
    An ordered series of level descriptions – a ladder
    with a number of rungs.
    Cont’d
    24
    Number of levels
    Definition of each level
    Level descriptors:
    Has fully operational command of the language with only occasional unsystematic inaccuracies and inappropriacies.

    Basic competence is limited to familiar situations. Have frequent problems in understanding and expression. Not able to use complex language.















    Cont’d
    25
    Level descriptors: wording and labels
    HD> D> C> P> F
    9> 8> 7> ….1
    Expert> Very good> Good> Competent> Modest>
    Limited…Non user
    Cut point/hurdle
    Top level
    Native speaker standard (?)






    Assessment criteria
    3 major approaches to scoring writing performance:
    Holistic
    Analytical
    Primary trait
    Assessment criteria
    27
    Varies according to the context and the purpose of assessment.
    Holistic scoring:
    a single score is assigned to one task performance on the basis of overall impression.

    Advantages:
    Relatively high inter-rater reliability
    Rapid scoring
    Scores tend to emphasize the writer’s strengths
    Scores represent ‘standards’ easily interpreted by lay people






    Holistic scoring
    28
    Disadvantages
    No diagnostic information (no washback potential)
    Subjective and impressionistic and difficult to explain
    Lower reliability


    Analytic scoring
    29
    Considering a set of criteria and assigning scores to each of them (e.g., content, organization, vocabulary, grammar etc).
    Advantages:
    Consideration of uneven development of sub-skills.
    Diagnostic information (enabling S to home in on weaknesses and to capitalize on strengths)
    More reliable
    Disadvantages:
    Halo effect
    Performance is more than the sum of its parts (wood and trees).
    Time-consuming
    Cont’d
    30
    Disadvantages:
    Halo effect
    Performance is more than the sum of its parts
    (wood and trees).
    Time-consuming





    Primary trait scoring
    31
    A kind of holistic scoring which identifies a key characteristic or trait which is crucial to task performance.
    (achievement of the primary purpose or trait of an essay is the only factor rated)
    Task-specific and data-driven
    e.g., the accuracy of the account of the original (summary)
    The expression of the writer’s opinion (response to an article)








    Cont’d
    32
    Advantages:
    Zeroing on actual performance
    Learning-friendly

    Disadvantages:

    Primary traits are difficult to write
    Disregard for individuality
    Not integrative enough
    Time-consuming and expensive


    Multiple trait scoring
    33
    Scoring on more than one facet or trait exhibited by the text.
    Cf. analytic scoring. Task-focused criteria
    and disregarding trivial features.
    Advantages:
    Increased validity and reliability
    More diagnostic information
    Positive washback effects
    Disadvantages:
    Difficult to identify traits appropriate for the given context.
    Problems of analytic scoring



    Steps in scale construction
    34
    Thinking and deciding:
    Purpose of testing
    Number of distinctions
    Score reporting
    Criteria of performance
    Feedback
    Type of scales – holistic or analytic, or both.
    Examining existing scales
    Calibrating the scale
    Selecting and training raters



    Subjectivity in scoring
    35
    Addressing issues of subjectivity
    Rater training and moderation
    Adhering to criteria of assessment
    Multiple trait scoring more reliable than primary trait or holistic scoring
    Multiple rating is more reliable than single rating
    Measuring reliability coefficient
    Classification analysis












    Portfolio assessment
    36
    A collection of written work by learners over a period of time.
    Exemplifies continuous/alternative assessment.

    Advantages:
    Focus on the process of writing and multiple drafts
    Writing ability as developmental and sequential
    Classroom environment as the basis of effective writing
    Authentic and learner-centred
    Activity
    Review the advantages and disadvantages of the three kinds of scoring: holistic, primary trait and analytic. Construct a chart that shows how different contexts (types of test, objectives of a curriculum, proficiency levels) may benefit from each kind of scoring.
    Leading Discussion
    38
    Group 5
    Group 6
     
    Gửi ý kiến